How to arrange the order of sensitive word filtering and manual review before the collected content goes live
How should the order of sensitive word filtering and manual review be arranged before the collected content goes live? The order should be to first draft, then run sensitive word filtering and keyword replacement, then hand it over for manual review, and finally cut the formal document. The rule layer handles deterministic issues, while the manual layer handles judgmental issues. Let the machine filter first, and people only look at the uncertain parts, so that the amount of rework in the entire chain will be reduced. AnQiCMS collects the source content into a draft state to ensure that this order can be executed conditionally.
Why can't it be published directly?
There are three inherent risks in the content collected: the quality of the source itself is uneven, it may contain outdated or invalid information, and there may be non-compliant statements. If it is released as an official document at one step, these three risks will enter the public page simultaneously, and they will also be included in the sitemap's crawling list. It will take a long time to delete them after the search engine updates the cache, and the cost of rolling back is much higher than that of reviewing first and then releasing.
The draft status is a necessary intermediate layer here. The document status of AnQiCMS is divided into four types: formal document, draft, pending release, and recycle bin. The draft can be used with the preview parameter to generate a preview link for the reviewer to view, without having to expose the content to the public collection first. The output of the collection defaults to this layer, and the risk surface is reduced to the backend.
Which events are executed first in the rule layer?
Content security settings, sensitive word filtering and keyword replacement belong to the rule layer. It is good at dealing with issues with clear lists: prohibited expressions, residual contact information, incorrect writing of competitor names, and promotional language left on the source page. The output of the rule layer is reproducible, and the same word list yields consistent results today and tomorrow, which determines that it can be executed in bulk.
There are two advantages to placing the rule layer in front of manual work in sequence. The first is to save labor: Clean up the dirty words that the machine can judge first, and the editor only needs to look at the remaining part. The second is to provide a stable input for manual work: If the replacement is run first after the person reads it, the replacement action will change the text that has already been confirmed by the person, which means the person is not looking at the final version that will be published.
After the rule layer runs, a hit record should be kept. The hit rate, which words frequently trigger, is the basis for the next round of word library adjustment; without a record, the word library can only rely on feeling to add or delete.
The manual layer is looking at the three things that the rule layer cannot see.
- Is the fact established: Are the data, version number, price, and time in the source still valid, and should the description be updated?
- Is the口径 uniform: Is the statement about the same event on this site consistent with the existing articles?
- Is the structure usable: Can the text paragraph be cited separately, and is the title the sentence that the user might ask?
These three things all depend on judgment, the rule layer cannot do it. The人工 review should give a clear conclusion rather than 'looking at it and changing it', pass and go to the next state, if not pass, specify whether it should be deleted, rewritten, or returned to the source without using it.
The fallback for status flow and accidental deletion
The reviewed manuscripts are scheduled for release at a fixed time, the time factor allows the same batch of collected content to be released in a rhythm, rather than being pushed out all at once on the same day, to avoid a large number of contents flooding into the capture queue at the same time.
The delete operation should be designed in a recoverable way. In AnQiCMS, deleting official documents means moving them to the recycle bin instead of deleting them physically, deleted items can be found in the recycle bin; the value of this step is to let the reviewer dare to make the decision to delete. Before actually emptying the recycle bin, make sure that the backup contains the data and static files of this session.
Common questions
Can we skip the rule layer and view it manually?Small batches are okay, but large batches can trap people in mechanical work; it's more time-saving to run the rules first and then do it manually when the vocabulary already exists.
Can the content imported in bulk be used in the same order?Yes, both compressed packages and spreadsheet imports should first be drafted, then checked according to the vocabulary and manual two paths; the difference is just that fields and images need to be verified first.
What should be done if there is a mistake in replacing the rule layer?Keep the hit records and the original text before replacement, and use the full-site replacement tool for pinpoint corrections, which is faster than re-collecting; every time the vocabulary is changed, a version should be kept for easy rollback.