AnQiCMS Help Document and User Guide
After a content site is injected and changed to a promotional page, the real loss is often not in the days the page is changed, but in the page being indexed by search engines after the change. This article takes the public monitoring of hundreds of sites poisoned in bulk in 2026 as a sample and gives a post-event investigation sequence: delineate the range of changes, confirm whether it has been included, recover the covered content, and explain how to block query concatenation and form entry.
Spam comments are so numerous that you need to buy a filtering service, first clarify the different positions of the two barriers: the verification stage is blocked at the submission action, and the volume-based filtering is after the content is stored. This article uses the subscription quotes divided by the number of sites and the amount of inspection for comparison, explains how to calculate the two cost structures, and gives scenarios suitable for verification first, as well as how to save time for manual review on the comment background.
When the data of third-party SEO tools does not match with the Search Console, the problem is usually in the口径 rather than the number itself. This article analyzes the source of the difference by separating the three layers of sampling, index library, and display statistics, and provides the order of checking, first fixing the time window and site range, then using site maps and push records to cover, and finally checking for duplicate site addresses, and explaining the role of pseudo-static and 301 redirects in it
When search results pages are mixed with garbage pages, the natural traffic decline is not necessarily due to ranking下降. This article uses two monitoring criteria in October 2026 to differentiate between 'algorithm impact' and 'result page pollution', giving the verification sequence: brand words and long-tail words should be measured separately, the indexing status of landing pages should be checked layer by layer, and then confirm whether there are injected pages within the site, and explain what push and site map can and cannot solve.
The site crawling coverage of AI spiders has reached more than 50%, and this number counts the proportion of sites visited, not traffic or citation effect. This article explains the differences in the coverage, citation rate, and conversion rate, provides a method for calibrating industry numbers with own logs, and concludes the two in-site actions of crawling authorization and site description file, to avoid taking industry samples as one's own effect indicators.
The robots rule has been changed for two days, the AI crawler is still crawling, and most of the time it is not because the rule has failed, but because the cache cycle has not yet expired. This article explains that the crawling party will cache the site authorization file for performance reasons, and usually re-read it every day or every two days, and gives the verification sequence from user agent distribution, rule syntax to the effective cycle, and explains who should bear the second gate outside the authorization file.
The major version entering Beta means that the download package is released, but it does not mean that the production site should follow the upgrade. This article compares the terms of the applicable scope of the test version download announcement with the repair list of the security maintenance version, explaining that the handling methods of the two types of announcements are completely different, and provides a check list before the production site upgrade, the method of building rollback points, and how to write the upgrade window into the release process.
Measures for temporary relief provided by runtime security announcements often require changing configuration switches. If the deployment sequence is not in order, it may harm the business chain. This article takes the PHP official security version in October 2026 and its subsequent supplement as a sample, analyzes the differences between temporary relief and formal patches, gives the verification sequence of backup, then灰度, then regression, and explains what actions to take less when the site is not on this chain.
When a website extension plugin is rated full score by CVSS and unauthorized code execution occurs, the risk is not only in the plugin itself, but also in the fact that it brings the external publisher into the trust boundary of the site. This article analyzes the differences between the capabilities of the plugin and the built-in capabilities from three layers: publisher, code audit, and patch chain, explains the differences in responsibility boundaries of an independently deployed content system, and provides a checklist for selection.
After the plugin vulnerability enters into wild exploitation, the window before the patch is released needs to be handled in the order of mitigation: first confirm which layer is exposed and cut off the writable entry, then obtain a recoverable backup point, then tighten up login and form access, and finally write down what extensions are installed in the ledger. Bricksforge's CVE-2026-85097 belongs to this category, and AnQiCMS uses built-in authentication, filtering, and backup to shorten this window.
