So Outside Technology Security CMS
AnQiCMS
Online Demonstration

When replacing the content in bulk on the entire site, which fields need to be backed up before they are changed?

📅 2026-11-01 👁️ 0

When replacing batch content on the entire site, the fields that need to be backed up are divided into three categories: document data itself (including static files), template files, and independent configurations such as navigation and watermark. If keywords and links in the main text are changed incorrectly, they can still be covered by the recycle bin and revision of each article; there is no ready-made recovery entry after the configuration items are bulk covered, so a snapshot should be frozen before replacement, and the scope of changes should be confirmed after replacement.

Which layers will the full site replacement affect

The station-wide replacement tool rewrite keywords or links in batches, usually covering three layers. The first layer is the document content and metadata, large in quantity and clear in rules, which is the main object for replacement. The second layer is the navigation settings, where navigation names and links are often hit by keyword rules, and the number of navigation entries is small, so once an error occurs, it can be seen throughout the entire station. The third layer is the watermark configuration and other site-level settings, which do not store article data, and are often not prompted when scanned by batch rules.

Make sure to confirm the anchor text separately. The automatic anchor text of the in-site keywords is related to the keywords in the text, but the anchor text rules have not been synchronized checked, which may lead to incorrect page links.

Which objects need to be backed up first

The backup and recovery capability covers data and static files. Before the operation, make sure that this backup includes three contents:

On the database side, the structured data such as documents, categories, and tags must have a complete backup before replacement. In case of errors, restore the entire set. On the file side, static resources such as uploaded images and attachments should also be included in the backup scope, especially when the replacement rules involve resource paths. On the configuration side, it is recommended to manually save a copy of the template files, navigation settings, and watermark management as exports or snapshots, as these areas have a fine granularity of recovery, few in number, and the cost of saving individually is very low.

A convenient judgment standard: any object that is not in the document table or cannot be retrieved from the database after an error is made should be frozen separately before replacement.

How to carry out inspections after replacement?

Do not just check the background records after replacement; inspect from the front-end entry to get closer to what readers see. Suggest following this order: randomly open several articles that were hit, confirm that the semantics after keyword replacement do not destroy the sentence; check each navigation entry one by one to confirm that the names and links point to the correct page; randomly check paragraphs with anchor text links to confirm that the link targets exist and do not point to deleted documents; confirm that the style is not abnormal on pages involving watermarks.

When correcting mistakes, there are two types of handling: data layer errors can be restored from backups or corrected item by item; configuration layer errors should prioritize the use of the frozen snapshot before replacement to restore item by item, narrowing the scope of replacement before execution. The trash can can handle deleted documents by mistake, but cannot handle configurations that have been overwritten, which is why backups need to be made in advance.

Common questions

Question: If a document is corrected, can the trash can save it?Answer: Deleted formal documents will enter the trash can and can be restored; however, the content replaced by replacement is not a deletion action, and there is no version before replacement in the trash can, which needs to rely on backups or item by item correction.

Question: Is it enough to back up the database?Answer: Not enough. The configuration of templates, navigation, watermarks, and others may not be in the document data, and static files are also outside the scope of database backups. It is recommended to freeze data, files, and configurations separately.

Question: The scope of the replacement rule is large, how to reduce the risk?Answer: First, test in a small range, such as limiting a category, and then expand after inspection. Keep a snapshot of the previous step before each expansion, and you can recover the latest one if there is a problem.

Related articles

Migrating from a hosting website building platform to a self-built content system, how to arrange the migration sequence to avoid losing indexing

Migrating in a fixed sequence ensures not losing indexing: First export the content list and make a complete backup, then use ZIP compression packages or Excel spreadsheets to batch import content. When importing, check for duplicate titles to avoid repeated搬运, and finally, set up 301 redirect mappings for old addresses and observe for two weeks. This article provides the key operational points and verification methods for each step, covering the backup scope of data and static files and the usage standards of the import interface.

2026-11-01

Batch migrating old website articles, is it more stable to import using a compressed package or a table?

The old site articles are moved in bulk, the choice between ZIP compressed package import and Excel table import depends on whether there are attachments and field structure: The migration of image static files and graphics goes through the compressed package, while batch creation of articles goes through field mapping. AnQiCMS also provides the import/archive import interface, which supports querying whether the title already exists, and can be checked before repeated import.

2026-11-01

How to coordinate the scheduling of content in holidays, scheduled publishing, and pending publishing status

When scheduling holidays in advance, the scheduled release solves the timing point, and the draft status to be released solves the review progress. AnQiCMS divides documents into four states: formal, draft, scheduled release, and recycling bin. The draft link with preview parameters can be reviewed before release, and deletion is moved to the recycling bin instead of physical deletion. There is a fallback path if scheduling fails.

2026-11-01

What items need to be checked when switching hosts on the day of switching, and parsing, certificates, and email cannot be missed.

Check the access chain on the day of the host switch: whether the resolution points to the new host, whether the certificate is complete and available at the new address, whether the pseudo-static rules and 301 redirect are effective, and whether the form and interface can be written. Before the switch, lower the validity period of the resolution record and make a complete backup containing static files. After the switch, keep the old account for more than a week and observe the log and traffic distribution. The record of the email sending identity should also be checked separately.

2026-11-01

After enabling pseudo-static, the links with query parameters jump to the wrong page, which URLs should be tested before going online?

The static alias modifies the address resolution entry, and if the rules are mistakenly damaged, the first problem to appear is with links containing query parameters, pagination, tag pages, and Chinese paths. There are similar repair records in the update logs of third-party open-source systems. This article provides the five types of links that must be tested before going online, the configuration order and rollback method of custom static alias rules, as well as which link to fix first when enabled simultaneously with the 301 redirect.

2026-11-01

After the PHP version enters the stage of only fixing security issues, when should the site be upgraded at the latest?

The PHP official policy is to actively support each branch for two years, and then add two more years for fixing only critical security issues. For example, the active support for 8.2 ends on December 31, 2024, and the security support extends to December 31, 2026; the security support for 8.3, 8.4, and 8.5 respectively ends at the end of 2027, 2028, and 2029. The bottom line for a site completing a major version upgrade is the end date of the security support for that branch, and it is a safe practice to start scheduling after entering the security-only stage.

2026-11-01

How should the arrangement of multi-language for cross-border e-commerce websites, and the steps of full page translation and language switching be arranged?

The order should be to define the site structure first, then translate the content, and finally configure the switch entry. The structure selection determines all subsequent work: whether it is a multilingual site or a site segmented by market, it directly affects the domain, content, and maintenance boundaries. The full-page HTML translation can cover the text, but template copy, glossary, and product attributes need to be reviewed separately; the switch entry should be released only after the language version can be verified to avoid visitors switching to a half-translated page.

2026-11-01

The PHP branch only has two years of active support, how should the site's runtime environment upgrade be scheduled?

The PHP official policy is to provide full support for each branch starting from the stable version, and then handle only critical security issues as needed for the next two years. According to the deadline on the current page, 8.2 to December 31, 2026, 8.3 to the same year in 2027, 8.4 to 2028, 8.5 to 2029. The site scheduling should separate these two stages and leave at least one complete regression cycle, and do not wait until the patch stops before starting.

2026-11-01