AnQiCMS Help Document and User Guide
The field of the access log is composed of format instructions and is not a fixed table structure. The source address, request line, status code, and time consumption come from the server side, and the source path and client identifier are provided by the requestor and can be forged. Writing to the client可控 fields must depend on escaping: The default escaping will handle double quotes, backslashes, and control characters, and variables that cannot be retrieved are marked with hyphens. The log configuration determines whether it is for the entire site or by path, deciding whether it can be distinguished in a multi-site scenario.
To be placed again. The purpose of the key and the verification file is to prove the ownership of the current domain and host, which is bound to the 'current site', not the machine that was uploaded initially. After changing the domain name, it should be placed again in the root directory of the new domain name or in a publicly accessible folder on the same host and re-verified. At the same time, the 301 jump, sitemap, and in-site link push queue from the old domain name to the new domain name should be rearranged separately - the jump relationship and the communication channel are two different things.
Full-page translation generates a complete page at one time, saving labor on the initial generation, but the cost is in the subsequent changes to the source page; manual entry of each field is more controllable, with labor spent on each change. The basis for judgment is not which is more advanced, but the frequency of revision and the number of sites: columns with frequent changes in source content are suitable for field-by-field, long-tail articles and brand site expansion are suitable for full-page generation followed by proofreading, and when multiple sites share a backend, it is necessary to clarify the maintenance boundaries first.
The verification codes for password recovery, login verification, and form anti-robot verification are not the same thing: recovery type requires random source sufficient, short validity period, error count lock binding to the same entry; form type requires blocking batch submission, which can be handed over to interactive verification such as reCAPTCHA. The same CMS has also strengthened in the recent version updates in this direction, changing the verification code to 6-digit secure random generation and adding expiration time and error count lock.
The automation risks for the title, keywords, and description are different: the title is recommended to be finalized manually, with candidates provided by the system; keywords are suitable for semi-automatic reclassification to the keyword library; the description can be generated automatically first and then reviewed by humans to ensure consistency, as it will be independently displayed by search engines. The common division of labor is for the system to produce the initial draft, humans to manage facts and tone, and the automatically generated results to be advanced to draft or pending publication status, and then released after acceptance.
The function of fetching remote images by address is essentially for the program to access an address on behalf of the initiator. If the target address is not constrained, it can point to an internal network service, which is the cause of server-side request forgery. The reinforcement needs to be done in four restrictions: connection timeout, response size limit, verification of the parsed address and internal network address interception, and re-verification after following the jump; the two links of batch import and content collection are only effective when using the same set of value boundaries.
When releasing more than twenty module-level security announcements at the same time, the handling order cannot be solely based on the rating. The available methods are to multiply the rating by 'whether I have installed this module or not': uninstalled modules can be closed directly, and for installed modules, you need to look at whether the exposed surface is a public web page or an internal background page, and then consider the rating level and whether there are available patches. The default operation interface at the site level is closed, which naturally excludes the capabilities that need to be explicitly enabled from the list of targets that can be attacked on that day.
The site expresses the scope of authorization for AI crawling at present, which has two layers of signals: exclusion rules based on paths and authorization statements based on purpose. The exclusion rules can specify which paths should not be crawled, but cannot clarify whether the same content can be used for training; the signals split by purpose can express separately for search, proxy access, and training, with granularity fine enough to set default values based on page conditions. The robots settings and the generation of explanatory documents for models are responsible for these two configurations inside the site.
If the database files, backup products, and logs in the site directory fall into a publicly accessible path, they can indeed be directly downloaded because the Web server defaults to returning requests that match files as static content. Interception should be divided into two layers: adding denial rules to the data directory at the deployment layer, and ensuring that backup and temporary files are not generated in accessible paths at the application layer. Both should be done before reviewing the default port exposure surface according to the list.
If the interface for deleting data and switching states in the background is allowed to be triggered directly through the browser's address, it has the risk of being misused by cross-site request forgery: when a malicious link is opened by a visitor while still logged in, the action of changing the state will be executed. The solution is to use two methods together - limiting the action of changing the state to a submission method and attaching a one-time form verification; the usage boundary of long-term login credentials should be stricter than that of one-time tickets.
