AnQiCMS Help Document and User Guide
When there is a style mess in only one site in the group, first divide the shape incorrectly and then decide which layer to check: large area images or missing style files, navigation position deviation, which is often related to the static resources and configuration of each site; only when there is a misalignment of the whole block structure or deformation of a certain column, check the template layer. This article gives the minimum action for checking per site and explains the boundary of templates, navigation, and backup under multiple sites, to avoid one change affecting the other two sites.
The purpose of lazy loading is to mark resources as non-critical and fetch them only when needed, thereby shortening the critical rendering path; the slow-down of the first screen is more due to rendering blocking resources, not much related to images. After setting lazy loading for images, the content written in the document remains unchanged, the change occurs in whether to retrieve it during the first rendering. This article gives a tiered approach according to the type of resources and explains the connection with the automatic title matching images and the media addresses in the sitemap.
The per-crawl charging control mechanism has already been provided in the document: the site sets the price for crawling, and if the payment proof is not provided during automatic access, a response code requiring payment will be received. It is currently in closed beta, and the rates are configured according to the domain area hierarchy instead of specific directory paths. The content side needs to confirm three things under this trend: how to express the exclusion rules, what was written in the site description file for large models, and whether anti-crawling and authorization are contradictory.
The announcement on the same day has the lowest rating, where the problem category is written as resource allocation without upper or lower limits, with low severity and a score of eight to twenty-five, requiring user permissions. The announcement recommends uninstalling the example modules first. The on-site performance of this type of problem is usually not an error, but slow response, memory climbing, and connection being dragged. This article explains why the low rating announcement still needs to follow up, how to judge on-site, and how to measure memory usage.
An information leakage announcement categorizes the complexity of the attack as complex and the impact as rare, so the score is not high, but the confidentiality dimension still has value, indicating that the line of 'reading what should not be read' is established. Whether to stop the service should not only be based on the rating level, but also on the judgment basis of the sensitivity of the leaked content and the scope of impact. This article provides a method for categorizing according to content sensitivity and account grouping.
An announcement lacking same-origin validation is rated moderately severe, with a score of twelve to twenty-five, the confidentiality dimension is recorded as zero, hence the score cannot go up; however, the integrity dimension is recorded as partial, with the consequence falling on the content itself being altered. This article explains the origin of such ratings item by item, and gives three layers of in-site control: form access human verification, content review before publication, and robot interception and frequency control for each section.
An announcement that ranks an object to the highest tier, with a reading method different from other categories: object injection occurs at the deserialization step, so what is closed first is not the module itself that is having issues, but who can get the data into this step. This article explains the source of the highest-tier signals by reading the announcement field item by item, and then gives the entry authentication, file integrity verification, and backup rollback three-level closing order.
In the release records of open-source programs, releasing four versions in the same month usually means a maintenance rhythm of once a week, but the follow-up cost depends on what each version changed. This article takes a publicly available GitHub release record as a sample, analyzes the three readings of release frequency, fix content, and rollback cost, and compares it with the announcement content of two versions at the beginning of October in this system, and gives what to consider together when making a selection.
The site map address can be written in the exclusion file or submitted separately to the search engine side, and the read times of the two declarations are different. The protocol also specifies the size limit: a single file may not exceed 50,000 addresses, uncompressed not more than fifty gigabytes, and the index file is subject to the same number and volume limits.
When the same content has multiple accessible addresses, it is equivalent whether the standard address is marked in the page or the response header; the protocol recognizes both positions; what really needs to be distinguished is whether it can be merged - use a redirect to close if it can be clearly unified, and use a standard address declaration if multiple entry points must be retained.
