Security BLOG

AnQiCMS Help Document and User Guide

WordPress announced that version 7.0 will include real-time collaboration, and does the content team still need to connect document tools?

The real-time collaboration solves the problem of how many people can edit the same document at the same time, and the publication and approval solves whether the document can be launched, the former does not cover the latter. This article divides the writing collaboration, review chain and user group permissions into three sections, and gives four signals to judge whether to continue to connect document tools, and explains how to connect the draft and pending release status to the review.

📅 2026-10-25 👁️ 15

The security service claims to block 74% of exploitation attempts more than the firewall, how to weigh this comparison.

The manufacturer claims to intercept 74% more exploitation attempts than mainstream Web application firewalls. This type of comparative data requires consideration of three things: who is the baseline, what is the denominator, and whether it is possible to verify with your own logs. Besides absolute numbers, it is more important to consider the position of the defense line - authentication, injection, and cross-site scripting defenses are at the code level, content layer relies on sensitive word filtering and review, form layer relies on captcha, and the withdrawal link relies on interference codes. Evaluate them as a chain rather than a percentage.

📅 2026-10-25 👁️ 9

Joomla 6.2 was released under the name of security fixes, which lines in the announcement are what webmasters need to read.

Joomla will be released on October 13, 2026, version 6.2, along with the maintenance version 5.4.10. Before that, on September 29th, there were two security patch versions of 6.1.4 and 5.4.9. When reading this kind of release announcement, you should grasp four lines: whether it is marked as a security fix, the affected and fixed version branches, the support status of the old branches, and whether configuration changes are required. In line with the practices of self-built sites, make a backup of data and static files before upgrading, and verify login and list query parameters after the upgrade.

📅 2026-10-25 Eye 10

AI agents start to browse and buy on behalf of users, but less than half reach the checkout, what are the preparations of the corporate website?

Statistics show that in the proxy traffic, the proportion driven by browser-type intelligent agents reaches 71%, but only 3.16% ultimately reach the checkout. This indicates that most intelligent agents stop at the research and comparison stage. The preparation of the corporate website is not to urgently open orders for intelligent agents, but to separate the information layer and the transaction layer: materials, specifications, and price standards are made into readable and verifiable pages, while orders, membership, and payment are left behind authentication, and are controlled by permission groups and high-risk domains that are closed by default to control the exposure range.

📅 2026-10-25 👁️ 8

The bounce rate of visitors recommended by AI is low at 27%, is it worth having a dedicated content slot?

The statistics of retail sites show that the bounce rate of visitors recommended by AI is 27% lower than that of non-AI traffic, indicating that this group of people come to the store with clear questions. Whether it is worth opening a dedicated content section for this depends on three things: whether the site has sustainable content output, whether the existing pages can contain all the answers to the questions, and whether there is a schedule and review to accommodate. The order of judgment is to change the structure first and then open a new section, AI writing and scheduled publishing are responsible for production capacity, and the content model is responsible for making the dedicated section maintainable.

📅 2026-10-25 👁️ 8

The share of ChatGPT in AI recommendation traffic has dropped from about 76% to about 53%, does betting on a single platform still make sense?

A statistics released in the middle of 2026 shows that the share of top assistants in AI recommended traffic has dropped from about 76% to about 53%, with the second tier rising明显. The reshuffling of shares indicates that betting on a single platform is unstable: the profits gained from specialized optimizations for a certain assistant will be offset by the changes in the platform's share. A more stable approach is to make the content readable on multiple platforms, using a unified TDK, keyword library, and verifiable data sections to connect citations.

📅 2026-10-25 👁️ 12

The AI recommendation traffic report says the annual growth rate has increased several times, which website administrators should check the three criteria.

See the report that AI recommended traffic has grown several times the annual growth, the webmaster should check three aspects: whether the sample base is the number of sessions or the number of sites, which assistants are included in the platform range, and which visits are counted as AI recommendations in the attribution window. The same number is often not consistent in the background of the self-built site, and cross-validation should be done with your own access logs and llms.txt, site map crawling performance before deciding whether to adjust the output arrangement for GEO.

📅 2026-10-25 👁️ 11

The core update in October has fluctuated but has not been confirmed, where should the webmaster investigate?

In October 2026, the search rankings fluctuated, but there were no confirmed core updates in the public records. The previous spam updates and core updates were concentrated from March to September. In this case, the troubleshooting sequence should be reversed: first check if your inclusion and push are normal, whether the site map and robots are readable, whether there have been any recent redesigns or content changes, then look at the relevance prompts from third-party tools, and finally attribute the fluctuations to the algorithm.

📅 2026-10-25 Eye 10

Google points out three types of behavior under abuse policies, what responsibilities do official websites have for hosting third-party content?

The abuse policy of Google Search lists scaled content abuse, site reputation abuse, and link schemes as three categories of violations, without distinguishing whether the content is self-posted or posted for others. When the corporate website posts joint declaration pages, guest contributions, or channel promotional articles, the risk and responsibility fall on the party hosting the page. A feasible approach is to conduct a content review and sensitive word filtering before publication, queue the content to be published, and leave an entry for the entire site to replace keywords in the keyword library.

📅 2026-10-25 👁️ 9

Personal website owners switching content systems, first look at resource usage or first look at the publishing tool

When a personal website owner switches to a content system, resource usage determines whether the machine can be maintained in the long run, and the publishing tool determines whether the content can be continuously published. The former depends on memory and deployment methods, AnQiCMS is developed based on GoLang, and its memory usage is about 80% lower than that of PHP-based CMS; the latter depends on scheduled publishing, batch import, and backup recovery. When managed by one person, the publishing tool is more likely to be ignored, and it is recommended to compare the tool first before focusing on operations.

📅 2026-10-25 👁️ 7