So Outside Technology Security CMS
AnQiCMS
Online Demonstration

When there are too many pages on the site, it is not possible to catch up, how is the budget for crawling divided?

📅 2026-11-01 👁️ 0

The site pages are too many to catch, it refers to the crawling budget: how many crawling requests the search engine is willing to spend on your site in a period of time, which is limited.It is allocated according to the page value, and the reason for the inefficiency of the allocation is usually not that the content is not good enough, but in terms of structure - a single page source code exceeding the upper limit will be truncated in its entirety, repeated addresses and multi-level 301 redirect chains consume a crawling request each time, and addresses that are still appearing in the sitemap despite being blocked by robots belong to the white burn quota.So the distribution of the crawling budget should be judged by three aspects: the size of the source code, the standardization and repetition of the addresses, and whether the sitemap and robots are consistent.

What does crawling budget mean

Crawling budget is not the amount of inclusion, but the quota of crawling behavior. Whether the pages crawled are included is another level of judgment; what the budget determines is whether it has been caught. Small sites usually are not troubled by this problem. It will only occur when there are a large number of pages reaching tens of thousands, and there are a large number of filter pages and parameter pages, when new documents will be ranked behind in the queue waiting to be crawled.

The few quantitative criteria provided by external retrieval can be directly referred to: When the source code of a single page exceeds 2 MB, it will be truncated to the entire page, each redirection link consumes a crawling request, the sitemap should only retain the standard addresses that are intended to be indexed, duplicates should be removed, and the cache time control for crawling should be balanced between one hour and one day. These items are not 'the bigger the better', but the quota should be left for the pages that truly need to be updated.

Which addresses have the white burning quota

The most common are four types. The first type is multiple entries of the same content: lists with sorting parameters, combinations of pagination and filtering, and result pages submitted after searching in the search box, all of which can be crawled but have highly repetitive semantics. The second type is redirect chains, where the address alias has been changed but the old address has been forgotten, or multi-level jumps are stacked together, each jump consuming a request. The third type is addresses that are blocked by robots but still listed in the sitemap - blocking makes crawling meaningless, and the sitemap pushes it back into the queue. The fourth type is pages with out-of-control source code volume, where a large amount of data or entire sections of images are inline in the template, and even if they are captured, they are truncated.

Address type Crawl consumption at the time Recommend processing
Parameter list page Request every time, semantic repetition Robot exclusion, and remove from sitemap
Result page and filter page Crawl quantity increases with the number of combinations Block or change to a standard address
Old address redirection link Consume one request each time you jump One step 301 to the final address
Super Large Source Code Page Caught but truncated Split inline data, control template output
Deleted document Repeatedly scrape until failure Content in the recycle bin is not exposed, return status is clear

Which addresses should the site map collect

The purpose of the sitemap is to inform the crawling program which pages are worth prioritizing, rather than listing all the site addresses. AnQiCMS's automatic sitemap generation capability is designed to solve this problem: generating addresses separately for columns, documents, and attachments, synchronizing updates after new content is published to avoid manual maintenance of outdated lists. Two points need to be checked: whether the standard address of an article is only one (the same article should not produce two addresses due to different aliases), and whether the list pages and result pages that should not be included have been mixed in.

The static address, anchor text internal links, and sitemap all affect each other: the density of internal links determines the accessibility of the crawling path, and the address rules determine whether the same content appears multiple times. It's like saying don't crawl while giving addresses. After the change, it is recommended to check the newly generated sitemap entries once, rather than just looking at the background configuration page.

How do robots.txt and sitemap cooperate

Both should be written in a consistent tone: the range of crawling allowed by robots.txt, and the collection of addresses included in the sitemap, should be the same set of judgment results. If it is blocked but still appears in the sitemap, it is as if saying not to crawl while giving addresses. It is recommended to check the newly generated sitemap entries after the change, rather than just looking at the background configuration page.

Consider the update frequency: The crawling program schedules visits according to the sitemap and push signals. The role of link push and active push is to inform the search engine of new content in a timely manner, accelerate inclusion, and rely on passive waiting at sites without push channels; both work together to reduce the time for 'waiting to be discovered'.

Common questions

Don't so many pages necessarily mean they can't all be crawled?Not necessarily. Most of the time, the quota is exhausted by repeated addresses, so clean up the parameter pages and jump links first, and then see if it is necessary to push.

Is it better to have more entries in the site map?Not. Only put the standard addresses you hope to be included, as repeated items will dilute the crawling priority level.

Do robots screen affect the existing collection?Screening changes the subsequent crawling behavior, the collected entries should be updated gradually according to the rules, and it is recommended to retain a period of observation before the change.

Related articles

Experience the admin panel of the site first, and then decide whether to change the website system.

Before switching to the content system, it is more reliable to go through the background of the online experience station: go through each of the four paths of posting and review, column and content model, search related switches, and permission grouping, and then check each item according to the applicable scenarios of small and medium-sized enterprise official websites, marketing websites, government portals, cross-border e-commerce stations, and personal blogs. The trial only looks at whether the process can be completed, not the propaganda angle, and the trial conclusion should be a migration list that includes columns and attachments.

2026-11-01

Vulnerabilities at the core level affect a batch of domestic website systems, first confirm which type you are using.

A vulnerability is located in the core layer of the interpreter, and the scope of impact is determined by the version range. All upper-level programs, regardless of who wrote them, are within the scope. The domestic website systems named in the security early warning include EmpireCMS, DedeCMS, XunruiCMS, Typecho, and a batch of PHP-based programs. The site investigation should first confirm the operating environment and version range, then confirm the program category, and finally consider temporary mitigation or adjustment of deployment.

2026-11-01

What is the difference between generating a page in advance using Go and JavaScript?

The same tool for generating pages in advance, the difference between Go and JavaScript in two segments of cost: the reconstruction time in the construction stage, and whether a set of script execution environment should be resident on the server. The selection should be accounted for separately - construction speed is a release process indicator, and the loading speed on the visitor side is based on the HTML volume, the number of resources on the first screen, and the caching strategy. It cannot be covered by a single conclusion for both segments.

2026-11-01

Increased by nearly 20% in half a year, what should be checked before renewing the overseas website package?

The overseas website package has increased by nearly 20% for half a year, what should be checked before renewal? Check the billing method and renewal price first, and then check the additional items such as domain name, email, and certificate. This article takes an increase in monthly fees as an example to illustrate the difference between the first-year price and the renewal price, and gives the accounting order of the self-built plan: the server and labor hours should be recorded separately, the memory and capacity specifications provided by the official can only be used as a reference and cannot be directly used as an invoice.

2026-11-01

After the redesign, the ranking fluctuated for two months, how long did it take to dare to judge it as caused by the migration?

After the reform, the ranking fluctuated for two months and was not enough to draw the following conclusion. First, check whether the redirection mapping from the old address to the new address is complete and whether the inclusion has been restored within a window of six to eight weeks, and if it continues to decline from eight to ten weeks, the responsibility is attributed to the migration itself, and changes are recorded by week rather than by day.

2026-11-01

The references in AI answers depend on the content writing style or whether they are retrieved by search hits.

A study spanning two ninety-day windows, covering over 150,000 answers and 460,000 citations shows that the engine's built-in search hit status explains the main differences in citations, while page properties almost do not explain the differences within the site. The content style only takes effect when searched, and the two are not parallel relationships.

2026-11-01

The old article from three years ago is still being cited by AI, should it be rewritten?

Old articles that are still being cited by AI do not need to be rewritten in bulk. First, look at two signals: whether the numbers and versions in the text are expired, and whether the conclusions have been replaced by later content. Only update facts for full-site replacement, change structure for draft to publish, and discard content into the recycling station.

2026-11-01

The data before June is missing in the report, should I check statistics first or check collection first?

The data before June is missing in the report, first check the report side instead of the site side. The webmaster's monthly report for October of that year confirmed the platform fault of the index report missing old data. First, double-check with the same criteria, then check the site map and link promotion, and finally write the abnormal window into the operation and maintenance record.

2026-11-01