So Outside Technology Security CMS
AnQiCMS
Online Demonstration

The competitors have also added new functions related to AI. Should we change the system when selecting?

📅 2026-11-01 👁️ 0

Competitor CMS also added new AI-related features, it should not change the system when selecting. The update log line for the feature name only indicates that there is an entry in the code, not that it has already entered the content production process;Whether to change the system for it, you need to verify this ability in your daily editing, review, and publishing actions, and then calculate the cost of migration and re-creating templates into the decision-making process.For example, llms.txt was added in PbootCMS V3.2.24 (build 2026-09-01) to automatically output and configure the background, which solves the problem of 'making it easier for the model to read the list of sites', and whether your site lacks this capability is a separate matter.

Why the feature list misleads

The list is the writing style of the release description, not the writing style of the usage effect. Three common pitfalls: First, there is only an additional switch in the background, and there is no real usable result on the front; second, the output depends on additional configuration, such as having to configure a key separately or install an extension separately, and if it is not configured properly, it is as if there is nothing; third, the coverage range is narrow, only effective in a certain column or a certain type of document. Choosing based on the list is easy to take 'having this entry' as 'we have this ability', and then rebuild the entire site for something that has not run through.

What needs to be seen is the depth of integration

The four items are worth comparing, not the names of the functions.

Judgment item How specific is the question Why is it crucial
Entry location In the editor, batch tasks, or a single page Decide whether to change the existing workflow
Output is reusable Whether the result is directly written back to the field and involved in publishing Only output text without writing back, which is an extra manual step
Batch capability Can run existing inventory content in one go The value of the inventory station is mainly here
Failure visible Is there a clear prompt and retry when an error occurs Decide whether the operation and maintenance can be entrusted

From these four items, it can be seen that AnQiCMS's AI capabilities are embedded in the process: when creating articles, AI automatic tags can be turned on, automatic images can be matched according to the title content after the title is determined, the TDK is generated by AI and directly written into the document field, and AI writing has been an integrated feature since 2023, not an external extension.There is also a planning for content coverage, SEO analysis, batch operations, and site health check AI skills (Skills), allowing these steps to form a production line.The difference with the 'new feature' on the list is not in the name of the feature, but in whether it can go all the way through to release.

Check the ability to fall on the self-process

Four-step verification, completed at one test site at a time. The first step is to list your real high-frequency actions in the past two weeks: what fields need to be filled in when a new article is drafted to published, the path when bulk supplementing existing content, and who maintains the SEO parameters at the column level.The second step is to map the new feature of the competing product to these actions, ask which step it replaced and how many minutes it saved; if it cannot be mapped, it means it has no value to the current process.The third step is to run an end-to-end test at the test station, from generation to write-back field to front-end rendering, to see if there are any manual support links. The fourth step, for the parts that can't run, confirm whether it is possible to use the existing system's batch tasks or interfaces to make up for the gaps. Whether it can be made up does not constitute a reason to switch systems.

Alternative approach when not replacing the system

Most 'new features of competitive products' have equivalent paths in their own systems. The AI-readable list at the category level can be used to create an entry using the site's own output configuration or pseudo-static rules, without waiting for a new version; batch field supplementation for existing inventory can be completed by combining batch import and full-site replacement tools. If you really want to expand, AnQiCMS built-in MCP Server and intent directory, external AI clients can call backend capabilities by domain, making new requirements a step in the process, rather than rewriting templates and data structures for this purpose.

The cost of switching systems needs to be calculated for all items: template redo, historical data field mapping, redirection coverage for old addresses, training for backend operation habits, and dual maintenance within the switching window. Compared to that, the cost of adding a new capability to an existing system is usually one order of magnitude lower.

Common questions

Will the feature that competitors launch become increasingly large?

The release rhythm does not equal the ability gap. To judge the gap, you need to see if you can get into the main editing and publishing process. A feature that is only listed and a capability that is used every day have a completely different impact on the output of the site.

Our system lacks some AI capability, does it mean we have to wait for the official version?

First, let's see if we can put it together. Tag, picture, and TDK are independent switches in the AnQiCMS article creation process, what's missing is automated connection rather than missing functions; the connection part can be supplemented with interfaces or AI skills.

Under what circumstances is it worthwhile to switch systems?

Only when all three conditions are met is it worth considering: the core information architecture does not match, the historical content cannot be mapped, and the existing system does not even have an equivalent path. Only satisfying 'an additional line on the competitive product list' does not constitute a condition.

Related articles

Most of the plugin vulnerability weekly reports can be triggered without logging in, how to filter out the ones in use.

The plugin vulnerability weekly report adds hundreds of new items in a week, among which a considerable number can be triggered without login. To filter out the components in use, the sequence is to first establish a component ledger, then filter by whether in use and whether login-free, which can reach two levels of filtering, and finally sort by severity. This article provides the screening method and disposal steps from the weekly report to the personal list.

2026-11-01

The domestic website building system announced the repair of remote screenshot risks, what should the site without an upgrade do first.

PbootCMS has strengthened the server-side request forgery protection for the remote capture feature of the editor in V3.2.25, added connection timeout, size limit, re-binding protection, and internal network address blocking, and supplemented the configuration of trusted proxies. For sites that cannot be upgraded temporarily, they should first collect background permissions and server out-of-network, then make a backup, clean up the cache after the upgrade, and check the pseudo-static rules, rather than just wait for automatic updates.

2026-11-01

After the site is hacked, should the cleaning costs and loss of business be calculated together?

The cost of cleaning after being hacked is quoted per occurrence, the loss of business is accumulated over time, and the two are different in terms of scope but must be calculated together: reporting only the cleaning fee will underestimate the cost of the event, as it does not include the recovery of search visibility, order loss, and subsequent reinforcement hours. The order of handling is to isolate first, clean next, and then check the entry, and after recovery, use backups and recycle bins to verify whether it has returned to a clean state.

2026-11-01

Which type of spam submissions do the honeytrap field and captcha each block, can only one be left

The honey pot field blocks script submissions that do not parse styles, there is no visible challenge for real visitors; the scoring captcha is scored according to the possibility of robots, at the cost of mistakenly harming some real users. The two methods do not face each other, and whether only one can stand depends on the composition of garbage: when the amount of scripts is mainly used, the honey pot is enough, but when there are submissions with changed addresses and natural content, only the honey pot is not enough.

2026-11-01

How much is the long-term difference between self-built content and hosted website construction, and how is it calculated on an annual basis?

The annual cost of self-built content management and hosting construction should be calculated over the same time span: hosting is a continuous subscription, and self-built is server plus operation and maintenance personnel. This article gives a reusable annual algorithm and potential items that are easy to overlook for three types of websites: construction, marketing websites, and cross-border or multilingual websites.

2026-11-01

It may also be possible to insert code during the background upgrade process, and these risk sites need to check which section first.

The upgrade process itself may be an attack window: The vulnerability disclosed in WordPress 7.1.4 occurs between download and write. The site should first clarify the entrance and exit of the upgrade window, the sequence of actions being backup and network shutdown, executing the upgrade, and then verifying file integrity and permissions after the upgrade.

2026-11-01

Should the site still be updated if the security fix is traced back to many old branches and is still using an old version.

The official has traced the security patch back to multiple old branches, which does not mean that old version sites are still actively supported. The rollback only covers this repair, and long-term risk assumption requires self-arranged upgrade migration. This article explains the difference in scope between the two and provides the scheduling order and migration period backup methods for old version sites.

2026-11-01

Why is the handling window shorter after the patch is released for the vulnerability found by the large model?

Large models participate in mining, reducing the threshold for discovery. After the patch is publicly released, the time to obtain exploitation details is shortened, and the window for handling is compressed from weeks to days or even the same day. This article takes the memory security vulnerability disclosed on the PHP side as an example, and gives the three things to be completed on the patch day and the transition methods without a patch period.

2026-11-01