So Outside Technology Security CMS
AnQiCMS
Online Demonstration

Does a small site need to worry about crawling budget, what two numbers do the backend look at first?

📅 2026-11-01 👁️ 0

Does a small site need to worry about the crawling budget, and what two numbers should the background look at first? In most cases, it does not need to be regarded as a bottleneck: what really blocks the crawling budget is a site with a large number of pages or frequent updates. The small site should first return to two indicators - the total number of daily crawling requests and the average response time in the search console, and stabilize these two lines before deciding whether to deal with broken links, redirect links, and bulky sitemaps.

At what scale does the crawling budget become a bottleneck?

The basis for judgment is the product of the total number of pages and the frequency of updates. For websites with a few thousand pages and content updated monthly, there is usually no lack of opportunities to be caught in a day; it is only for websites with tens of thousands of pages or more, with a large number of new entries added daily, and with filtering combinations that deep pages may not be indexed for a long time. The former is more common problem is that new pages are not indexed for a long time, which belongs to the submission and internal link issues, not quota issues.

How to read the two indicators on the back-end

Indicator Pronunciation Check first when an abnormal situation occurs
Total number of crawling requests per day Check whether the trend matches the content volume, whether there are sudden increases or collapses Parameter page combinations, temporary addresses, and blocked paths
Average Response Time The longer the crawling end waits, the fewer addresses it can process within the same unit of time Database slow query, whether staticization is effective, proxy and cache configuration

The two should be considered together: high request rate but slow response, waste is more obvious; low request rate but normal response, it is usually that the internal links do not pass on the entry.

Common three types of waste

The first is a dead link, pointing to a deleted document or a non-existent address, and the spider still comes for a visit; the second is a redirect chain, the old address jumps to a new address and then jumps again, multi-level chain jumps consume requests on the path; the third is a heavy page, the list page packs a large number of entries and scripts into the first screen. The corresponding treatment is also very direct: redirect the old address to the final address in one step, regularly remove error pages and redirect pages from the site map, and only write the paths excluded by the robots rules when needed.

What addresses should be placed in the site map?

Place only the addresses you want included, and that are currently returning normal results. Addresses that have been deleted, are pending publication, or have temporary parameters should not appear; multi-site or language versions should be maintained separately, do not mix the two sets of addresses into the same file. Pair new content with revised addresses and proactive push notifications to make discovery actions not have to wait for the next opportunity to grab it.

The priority sorting of the small station

Sort actions by profit: first clear invalid links and multi-level redirects, this kind of change can be done in one day; then check whether the addresses in the site map are all returning normally and whether they should all be included; then look at the weight of the page, how many entries and scripts the list page can load at one time; finally, it's the turn of the robots rules, clearly excluding paths that do not need to be crawled. The investment on the content side cannot be saved either - the more common problem with small stations is that there is too little content available for crawling and the internal links are too shallow, which cannot be solved by quota optimization.

Common questions

Don't we need to pay attention to crawling at all for small stations?The waste to manage is not the quota, but the dead links and redirect chains are low-cost high-yield cleaning items.

How long is considered slow response time?Focus on the relative changes before and after the revision or migration based on the self baseline, not the absolute millisecond numbers.

Is it better to have a larger sitemap?No, if the entries contain addresses that should not be included, it will only waste both the crawling and indexing quota.

** Should the robots file contain full rules? ** Only exclude paths that should not be crawled explicitly, and it's easy to block normal entries with indiscriminate blocking.

What should be done first when a new site goes live?First, make sure the internal links on the homepage, columns, and representative content are connected, and then perform active push to ensure that the new address is read on the first day.

Related articles

The average click-through rate of questions with AI overview has dropped by about 20%, what other indicators can be attributed to

The average click-through rate dropped by about 20%, coming from the mean comparison of ten thousand-level keyword samples, which is the relative difference between the baseline with overview and without overview, and cannot be taken as the decline of a single site directly. Single-site attribution is more suitable for viewing the traffic of brand words and non-informational intent, the conversion process after entering the site, and the structural changes after retaining the control period, with the click-through rate itself only being one of the signals.

2026-11-01

The program itself is free, but the plugins are charged by seat. How do you calculate this cost when selecting?

The cost-free is the software authorization, not the entire cost. The selection should be broken down into four segments for pricing: software license, hosting resources, plugins charged per person or per site, and upgrade backup and other maintenance labor. The larger the team, the more sites, the more obvious the difference in seat fees and hosting fees, and the total account should be calculated based on the same number of people and the number of sites when comparing.

2026-11-01

The screening conditions generate a large number of similar pages, whether to block crawling first or block indexing first.

The screening page should first determine whether the waste is the crawling quota or the inclusion quota: the address combination is still being repeatedly requested, which belongs to the crawling side issue, and can be收敛 using robots rules; the page has been crawled and entered into the inclusion before talking about indexing, the handling of whether to index should be canceled indexing or merge the standard address into the main page, blocking crawling itself will not cancel the existing inclusion.

2026-11-01

How to control the crawling depth of list pages when pagination and infinite scrolling coexist

The depth of crawling on the list page is determined by the internal link structure: Infinite scrolling must retain direct access to pagination addresses, each page returns complete HTML and real links, and page turn marks are no longer considered as inclusion signals. The control means three things - fixed pagination parameters, hanging the entry text into a crawlable link, and supplementing the deep content with site maps and anchor text, rather than expanding the page numbers infinitely.

2026-11-01

After the redesign changed the domain name, do we need to keep the redirection of the old address active?

The redirect after changing the domain name is not an obligation forever, but addresses that have received external backlinks or have stable traffic should be retained for a long time, usually at least one year before evaluation; after removing, the old address will directly return an error page, and the backlinks and weight will be cut off accordingly. The cleaning sequence is to do address mapping first, then cut the traffic, and finally batch replace the internal links within the site to avoid diluting the signal of multi-level redirect chains.

2026-11-01

Where is the difference in construction costs between static pages and dynamic sites, and who has higher post-maintenance costs?

The price range of static sites during the construction period is lower, while dynamic sites are expensive in terms of backend, database, and security patches; during the operation period, the situation is reversed, where the content update of static sites depends on technical intervention, and dynamic sites require continuous upgrades and backup work. Sites with frequent updates are more suitable for content systems with backend and scheduled publishing, separating the update actions from the development time.

2026-11-01

Should the new article be submitted to the search engine actively, and which companies does this protocol cover?

The proactive submission resolves the section of

2026-11-01

After a website is attacked, it is necessary to restore the backup, should the vulnerability be patched first or the data be restored first?

The order of disposal is to first cut off the entry that can be reused again, install the affected programs and extensions, and then recover from a known good backup. Restoring data will bring back the time points with backdoors, and the repeated infections are mostly caused by this. After recovery, it is also necessary to check the accounts, scheduled tasks, and modified files, and confirm whether the deleted content still stays in the recycle bin.

2026-11-01