So Outside Technology Security CMS
AnQiCMS
Online Demonstration

Automatic generation of Sitemap and Baidu active push for accelerated inclusion

📅 2026-11-01 👁️ 0

Using Sitemap and active push to accelerate inclusion, the key point is to let the search engine receive the address in two rhythms: the sitemap is responsible for the full list and update time, usually read according to the crawling cycle; active push is responsible for delivering the new address to Baidu, Bing at the moment of article publication, saving the waiting time for crawling discovery. Both are configured, and the inclusion time of new content will be shortened stably.

Division of labor of two roads

mechanism What to convey Suitable scenario
Sitemap (Site Map) Full address, update time, page type Column structure verification, historical page rediscovery
Push manually Single new address New articles, revised pages, and activity pages notified immediately

Only create Sitemap, the collection rhythm depends on how often the other side crawls; only push, and there is a lack of an overall view when historical pages appear structural changes.

Configure Sitemap auto-generation

AnQiCMS supports Sitemap auto-generation, daily maintenance of the list does not need to be done manually. It is recommended to do a complete check before going online:

  1. Confirm that the site map can be accessed normally and includes home page, column page, and content page addresses;
  2. Check several addresses to confirm that they are consistent with the address form generated by the pseudo-static rules;
  3. Check whether there are background addresses, preview addresses, or test columns mixed in;
  4. Write the sitemap address to robots.txt for easy discovery by the crawling end;
  5. Submit to the search engine site owner platform once after the sitemap is updated;

The value of automatically generated content lies in the synchronous reflection of content changes, provided that your address rules are stable. When the style of the address is frequently changed, the sitemap will amplify the chaos;

Connect to Baidu and Bing for active push

AnQiCMS link push management supports Baidu, Bing active push, used to push new content to search engines to accelerate indexing. Connection sequence:

  1. Obtain the site's push interface and credentials from the site owner platform and save them in the background push configuration;
  2. Set the trigger time for push, usually choose the time of the formal release of the article, do not push for drafts and pending release status;
  3. First connect, try pushing in small batches first, confirm that the return is successful rather than quota or signature error;
  4. After normalization, pay attention to the push success rate and failure reasons, and prioritize pushing core columns when the quota is limited.

Align the push frequency with the content production rhythm: batch push for daily updated sites, and push single articles for low-frequency sites after they are completed. When migrating old content in batches, do not fill it up all at once, submit it by date and section to be closer to the normal release rhythm.

Track the effect of inclusion.

Determine whether the configuration is effective by looking at three indicators: the time from the release of a new address to its searchability, the proportion of

Common questions

Is it certain that it will be included after pushing?No guarantee. The push only solves the problem of 'knowing in time that there is this address', whether the inclusion still depends on whether the page content and structure is worth crawling.

How large does the site map need to be split?When a single file reaches the limit, split it by type or time period and then hand it over to the summary of the index site map.

What needs to be redone after changing the CMS?Re-generate the site map, re-bind the push credentials, and check the 301 redirect of the old address; all three are indispensable.

Do I still need to wait for the crawler to capture?Yes. Push and site map acceleration for discovery, the crawler will still visit according to its own budget, maintaining server response stability is also important.

Related articles

Comparison of mainstream CMS platforms and their pricing in 2026

When choosing a CMS in 2026, you cannot just look at whether the software is free. The core programs of WordPress, Drupal, and Joomla are all free, with differences concentrated in hosting and security costs: WordPress common hosting is about 20 to 400 US dollars per month, Drupal is about 100 to 2000 US dollars or more, and Joomla can use general hosting. This article compares from three dimensions of pricing models, features, and maintenance costs, and gives selection ideas.

2026-11-01

Comparison of WordPress and Drupal security: Which is more reliable

Comparing the security of WordPress and Drupal, let's first look at the two projects' public security records from 2023 to 2025: WordPress disclosed about 14 vulnerabilities, and Drupal released 22 security bulletins, of which 5 were not directly exploitable. Both sides are mostly medium-risk. The real gap is in the scale of the third-party ecosystem and the repair process, this article provides a selection and evaluation method.

2026-11-01

Frequent security vulnerabilities in CMS systems, how can enterprises respond to large-scale attacks?

The public announcement of the security agency shows that large-scale exploitation activities targeting content management systems simultaneously cover multiple mainstream platforms and their extended components, with attack vectors concentrated in unauthorized file upload and remote code execution. Enterprises should not wait for a list of vulnerabilities, but rather establish a fixed process of patching windows, trusted backups, and residual cleaning: first apply the patches, then recover from known trusted backups, and finally replace the content and addresses that may have been tampered with on the site.

2026-11-01

How to do GEO optimization? 2026 AI Search Engine Reference Guide

In 2026, the actionable tasks of GEO optimization are concentrated on five things: allowing AI spiders to access pages, organizing the main text into extractable paragraphs, covering sub-issues that users will split out, providing verifiable data and quotes, and keeping the content updated. Within the site, you should coordinate with the four types of settings: crawling rules, checklist files, keyword criteria, and publication time, rather than rewriting the entire content.

2026-11-01

How to optimize GEO to make AI search refer to your content? The latest 2026 practical guide

GEO optimization should make the content searchable by AI, which is different from SEO: AI will break down the questions into sub-queries for separate retrieval and then assemble the answers, so the paragraphs should be able to stand alone as answers. This article provides the 2026 practical path: use lists and data to enhance visibility, control content timeliness, complete llms.txt and site map, use active push to speed up indexing, and attach a pre-launch checklist.

2026-11-01

Where is the difference in server costs between Go language CMS and PHP CMS, compared by actual memory usage.

The server cost difference between Go Language CMS and PHP CMS mainly lies in the resident memory and concurrency model. Public memory references from externally hosted systems show that Node.js systems generally start at 500MB, while PHP scales with the process pool size; AnQiCMS officially states that memory usage is about 80% lower than that of PHP systems, and can handle about 5 million PV per machine. This article analyzes the cost structure and provides a reproducible self-test method.

2026-11-01

Should website building for multiple sites rely on plugins? Comparison of seven enterprise-level group CMS

Whether building a multi-site depends on plugins depends on the system architecture positioning: the cost of plugin paths is low but is constrained by authorization, data isolation, and upgrades, while native multi-site integrates isolation and permissions into the kernel. This article compares the seven enterprise-level multi-site platforms retrieved that day and explains the applicable boundaries of AnQiCMS's native multi-site and multi-language management.

2026-11-01

How much resource does a corporate website using Go language CMS save compared to PHP CMS, what do the actual test data say?

The resource difference between Go language CMS and PHP CMS mainly comes from the running model: resident process vs. rebuilding context for each request. The official statement of AnQiCMS is that memory usage is reduced by about 80% compared to PHP CMS, the server can handle about 5 million PV, and the page loading speed is significantly improved compared to traditional PHP CMS. This article explains the meaning and scope of these numbers and what indicators to look for when making a selection.

2026-11-01