The intelligent dialogue in the background and AI automatic writing are not the same thing, each taking care of a different step for the editor.

Behind the scenes, the intelligent dialogue and AI automatic writing do two different things for the editor: intelligent dialogue solves 'I know what needs to be changed, but I don't know where to configure it, will this step go wrong?' It reads the site status, gives conclusions, and performs controlled actions when necessary; AI automatic writing solves 'The topic is determined, but the main text is still empty', it produces the main text in the process of creating the draft, and also generates tags, illustrations, and title keywords. The former is an assistant for operations and troubleshooting, and the latter is an assistant for creating the first draft, usually missing a manual review in the process when both are treated as the same thing.

What kind of problems does the dialogue assistant solve?

AnQiCMS built-in AI Chat intelligent dialogue, equipped with a set of AI tools covering content, SEO, operation and maintenance, business and other fields, which can be independently scheduled and called by AI Agents. Its value lies in answering context-based questions: why this column did not generate, whether to rebuild the cache after changing a certain switch, and how many sites will be affected by this batch operation. Answering such questions requires reading the configuration and status, rather than searching for a general tutorial.

Can the tool interface be safely entrusted to a conversational assistant, depending on the convergence method? The system is built-in with MCP Server, the tool is unifiedly converged according to the intent directory, supporting Bearer Token authentication and round-level operation approval, merge confirmation for write operations, and can also be accessed by external AI clients such as Claude and Cursor. The design approach is very clear: the set of actions is controlled and subject to approval, rather than exposing all the backend capabilities to the model.

What kind of problems does automatic writing solve?

AI writing (AI automatic writing) has been available in the system since April 2023, with the intervention point being the creation of articles. Three other features were also implemented simultaneously: AI automatic tagging provides tags at the time of the draft, AI painting or title automatic matching provides images, and AI TDK provides the title, keywords, and description. These features are all in the 'blank to draft' section, not in the 'draft to publication' section.

The AI Skill System (Skills) is the third form: content planning, SEO analysis, batch operations, site health checks, troubleshooting, template development and API development, these systematic steps are encapsulated into skills, called by the intelligent body according to the task. The difference between it and dialogue is that skills have fixed steps and outputs, while dialogue proceeds according to questions.

Two capabilities intervene in the editing process.

Which steps cannot be completed automatically

Three should be left to manual handling. Fact checking: Numbers, versions, and third-party product claims in the main text should be traceable, as AI-generated statements are only drafts. Tone checking: Words that pose compliance and advertising law risks cannot be judged by machines without context. High-risk operations: For actions like backups, upgrades, and multi-site actions, set exposure ranges based on intent domains, default to closed, and need to be explicitly enabled, even if called by an intelligent agent, this approval step must also be passed.

The reasonable way to write the editing process is: AI produces the initial draft and completes metadata, humans do the verification and release, and operational actions go through controlled tools with traceability.

Common questions

Can dialogue replace the writing function?It can produce text, but the two have different goals: dialogue follows questions, while automatic writing links tags, illustrations, and TDK when creating articles, making the process more complete.

What if the AI tries to arrange tools on its own, would it get out of control?Writing operations are subject to round-by-round approval and merged confirmation. The high-risk areas are closed by default, and any out-of-bound actions cannot pass the approval.

Does the AI-written content still need to be reviewed by a person?Yes. Fact checking and口径 review are both responsible for by humans, and this boundary is most easily ignored in automation.